Huge explanation of why Schrödinger's Cat is wrong

[Bray]

It isn't wrong.

[Ponco]

I tend to disagree, I think you are missing the point of Schrodinger's Cat, it is a mental exercise not a proof. I'm no physics expert but I do know the experiment is designed to demonstrate uncertainty, indeed you are "observing".

Not totally sure but I think you might have an interesting article on your hands? Did you write that?

[khz]

Conscious observers causing wavefunction collapse fell out of fashion with pretty much 99.999% of reputable physicists like 4 decades ago. I think there was talk of it in the 1920s-1940s, but in recent decades only a few crackpots have spoken in support of it (Goswami is the only one I know of). Not that consc causing reduction is wrong, it's just that it's unparsimonious under any physicalist regime.

What you're describing is decoherence theory. Been around for quite a while now.

Also your summation of what the wavefunction "is" is just one interpretation. Don't forget there's many interpretations: many worlds, 2 time directions, decoherence, deterministic with point-particle guided by a field, ... , approaches : that tell a different story